|
Cautious
Optimism at Croome
Croome Court
in Worcestershire has been empty for over ten years. The Grade
I Georgian house is largely the work of Lancelot "Capability"
Brown, who also designed the park which was acquired by the National
Trust in 1995.
Earlier this
year Malvern Hills District Council approved plans to convert
the stables and ancillary wing into 15 apartments, whilst leaving
the mansion empty - subject to the Secretary of State's approval.
English Heritage accepted the scheme, but SAVE and the Georgian
Group objected vigorously that this would compromise future uses
for the mansion, and threatened to condemn it to another decade
of vacancy and decay.
As
a result the Secretary of State refused to consider the application
until one for the mansion had been received as well. Such an application
has now been made. There are a number of particular problems with
the scheme to use the magnificent state rooms as offices and the
first and second floors as apartments, but a comprehensive scheme
for the whole group of buildings is a huge step in the right direction.
Success in Stamford
A
vigorous local campaign, supported by SAVE, has forced South Kesteven
District Council to throw out an application to redevelop a very
sensitive site beside the Town Meadow. Stamford Civic Society
demonstrated that the 14 houses would have destroyed the finest
view of the town - of the roofs rising up to the church spires
from the Meadows and the Town Bridge - much to the anger of councillors.
The development would have required the demolition of a number
of interesting eighteenth and nineteenth century buildings on
the site of the earliest settlement in Stamford, and the loss
of a medieval right of way, St Mary's Passage, which is still
entered through a Norman arch from St Mary's Hill.
Up
until a week and a half before the committee meeting, the feeling
was still that the scheme would be approved. However, pressure
from SAVE, English Heritage and the amenity societies turned the
tide. There is clearly scope for some development of the site,
but this must be based on principles of sensitive reuse and insertion
rather than wholesale clearance.
Royal William Yard, Plymouth
A case of
great concern to SAVE for most of the decade. After many years
in the inept hands of the now defunct Plymouth Development Corporation,
the Yard has passed into the hands of English Partnerships. Our
growing concern, shard by many, is that EP might repeat many of
the mistakes made by its predecessor.
The Yard is
one of the finest industrial and military complexes in the country,
built by Sir John Rennie in 1825 - 33 as a model factory and storage
complex to supply the fleet with all its victualling needs. It
consists of seven Scheduled Ancient Monuments (soon to be Grade
I listed buildings) of monumental classicism. After being released
by the MoD in 1994, it passed in to the hand of the Development
Corporation, who finally reached agreement with developers MEPC
to develop a 120,000 sq. ft factory retail village in the Yard
just before it was wound up. The MEPC scheme envisage 2.3 million
visitors a year, despite the very difficult access along a narrow
residential peninsula, and a multi story car park in the Yard
itself. Moreover, MEPC only had uses for approximately 50% of
the floor area, and the scale of the retail operation would put
off other potential users.
Fortunately,
MEPC has now pulled out, but in carrying out yet another master-planning
exercise, EP appears to be resurrecting another of the Development
Corporation's unrealistic ideas - attracting a "major themed attraction"
to the site. SAVE believes that the future of the Yard would be
best secured as a kind of urban village, predominately residential,
but also with retail, office, workshops, restaurants and bars,
a hotel and other uses creating a lively new quarter by day and
night. This is a view supported by many local property professionals
and we will continue to press for such an approach to be adopted.
Cricket
St Thomas
This country
house and park in Somerset is most familiar as the setting for
the TV programme To the Manor Born. For many years the Grade II
house and the II* registered park has been the home of a wildlife
park. SAVE was appalled to learn recently of an application to
build a 24o room hotel complex next to the house. This would have
a devastating and permanent impact on the garden and park and
the setting of the house and would involve the demolition of a
number of interesting ancillary buildings, and the application
was opposed by SAVE, the Georgian Group, the Ancient Monuments
Society, the Garden History Society and the CPRE. However, English
Heritage did not object and South Somerset District Council approved
the plans. The objectors immediately asked for the case to be
called in for public inquiry, but the Secretary of State refused.
The case throws
up a number of worrying issues. First, the scheme will undoubtedly
cause enormous harm to a II* registered landscape. It is hard
for such a vast complex not to. Second, the quality of the officer's
report was extremely poor, relying uncritically on the applicant's
supporting statement, which contained no adequate assessment of
the impact of the development on the listed buildings and registered
landscape. Third, English Heritage has simply, in the opinion
of the other national conservation bodies, failed in this case
to adequately protect the historic environment. It appears not
to have learnt from the sad case of Down Hall in Bridport to make
the best use is made of its in-house gardens expertise. Moreover,
the united and vociferous opposition of half a dozen expert national
organisations counted for naught because both the local authority
and the Secretary of State accepted the "official" opinion of
English Heritage, despite it being alone in supporting the scheme.
There appears
to be little chance of preventing the development now, and no
doubt that it will permanently disfigure this quintessentially
English location. Moreover, the developers, Warner Holidays, who
have already created three similar developments in listed country
houses are planning a further nine such hotels. No doubt we will
be meeting them elsewhere in the future.
|